02.01.2012 News Releases, Policy Points

Local Job Markets Post Little Progress In 2011

CHAPEL HILL (February 1, 2012) – Between December 2010 and December 2011, unemployment rates rose in 68 of North Carolina’s 100 counties and in 8 of the state’s 14 metropolitan areas. In December 2011, 29 counties and 3 metros had labor forces that were smaller in size compared to one year ago. These findings come from new estimates from the North Carolina Department of Commerce Division of Employment Security.

“December was the weak end to weak year for most of North Carolina’s local labor markets,” said John Quinterno, a principal with South by North Strategies, Ltd., a research firm specializing in economic and social policy. “In 59 counties, at least 10 percent of the labor force was unemployed in December, up from 57 counties a year ago. Similarly, the size of the labor force fell in 29 counties, which suggests that joblessness is more widespread than captured in the official unemployment statistics.”

Since the economy fell into recession in December 2007, North Carolina has lost, on net, 7.1 percent of its payroll employment base (-295,300 positions) and has seen its unadjusted unemployment rate climb from 4.7 percent to 9.8 percent. In December, the state shed 4,400 more payroll jobs than it added. Since bottoming out in February 2010, the state’s labor market has netted an average of 1,300 jobs per month, resulting in a cumulative gain of just 27,700 jobs.

Between November and December, unemployment rates rose in 93 counties and were at or above 10 percent in 59 counties. Individual county rates ranged from 6.1 percent in Orange County to 17.5 percent in Graham County. Compared to a year ago, unemployment rates were higher in 68 counties, unchanged in 5 counties, and lower in 27 counties.

“Non-metropolitan labor markets remained weak in 2011,” added Quinterno. “In December, 10.9 percent of the non-metro labor force was unemployed, compared to 9.4 percent of the metro labor force. Over the year, the rural unemployment rate held steady. Compared to December 2007, the non-metro labor force is 3.5 percent smaller. Similarly, the number of employed rural residents has fallen by 9 percent, while the number of unemployed rural persons has grown by 90.8 percent and now numbers 141,741.”

Last month, unemployment rates rose in 13 of the state’s metropolitan areas and fell in one metro (Burlington). Rocky Mount had the highest unemployment rate (12.9 percent), followed by Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir (11.9 percent). Durham-Chapel Hill had the lowest rate (7.5 percent), followed by Asheville (7.9 percent).

Compared to December 2010, unemployment rates were higher in 69 counties and 8 metros. Moreover, 29 counties and 3 metros had smaller labor forces. Among metros, Wilmington recorded the largest decline in the size of its labor force (-2 percent), followed by Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir (-1.9 percent). Fayetteville posted the largest increase (+3.3 percent), followed by Greensboro (+1.9 percent) and Greenville (+1.6 percent).

In the long term, any meaningful recovery will hinge on growth in the state’s three major regions: Charlotte, the Research Triangle, and the Piedmont Triad. Yet growth remains sluggish. Collectively, employment in these three metro regions has fallen by 4.2 percent since December 2007, and the combined December unemployment rate in the three metros equaled 9.1 percent. Of the three broad regions, the Research Triangle had the lowest unemployment rate (8 percent), followed by the Piedmont Triad (9.8 percent), and Charlotte (10.5 percent).

“North Carolina’s local labor markets ended 2011 little different than they started the year,” said Quinterno. “Statewide job growth has been anemic at best, and as a result, nearly a half million North Carolinians are jobless and actively seeking work. The same basic dynamic is playing out to differing degrees in communities throughout the state.”

02.01.2012 Policy Points

Weak Labor Demand = Long Unemployment Spells

A research letter from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco analyzes the causes of the  increasing duration of spells of unemployment …

The analyses discussed here suggest that weak labor demand is the primary explanation for prolonged unemployment duration observed in the recent recession and recovery. The weak recovery of employment is similar to the jobless recoveries that followed the 1990–91 and 2001 recessions. This suggests that the labor market has changed in ways that prevent the cyclical bounceback in the labor market that followed past recessions. The shift towards jobless recoveries probably reflects a reduction in temporary layoffs during cyclical downturns. Stricter market incentives to control costs in the face of stiff domestic and international competition may also be factors. In addition, anecdotal evidence suggests that recent employer reluctance to hire reflects an unusual degree of uncertainty about future growth in product demand and labor costs. These special factors are not readily addressed through conventional monetary or fiscal policies. But such policies may be able to offset the central obstacle of weak aggregate demand.

01.31.2012 Policy Points

Around The Dial – January 31, 2012

Economic policy reports, blog postings, and media stories of interest:

01.31.2012 Policy Points

Put The Cork Back In The Champagne

Dean Baker does not buy the received wisdom regarding the most recent GDP report

The long and short is that there was likely little change in the underlying rate of growth from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. The winding down of the stimulus, coupled with the negative impact from the Japan earthquake brought growth to a near halt in the first half of the year.

Now that the stimulus has almost fully unwound we are back on a growth path of around 2.5 percent — pretty much the economy’s trend rate of growth. This means that we are making up little or none of the ground lost during the recession. That is a really bad story.

01.31.2012 Policy Points

Watching The Trains Collide

Paul Krugman “troubles deaf heaven with his bootless cries” against austerity …

It’s hard to overstate just how wrong all this is. We have a situation in which resources are sitting idle looking for uses — massive unemployment of workers, especially construction workers, capital so bereft of good investment opportunities that it’s available to the federal government at negative real interest rates. Never mind multipliers and all that (although they exist too); this is a time when government investment should be pushed very hard. Instead, it’s being slashed.

What an utter disaster.

01.30.2012 Policy Points

Around The Dial – January 30, 2012

Economic policy reports, blog postings, and media stories of interest: