Policy Points

13.11.2009 Policy Points Comments Off on Community Colleges and Upward Mobility

Community Colleges and Upward Mobility

Americans long have viewed higher education as an engine of upward economic mobility. Typically, discussions of higher education revolve around the outcomes associated with attending four-year institutions and pay scant attention to the benefits of two-year schools.

To correct that shortcoming, the Economic Mobility Project of the Pew Charitable Trusts recently conducted a study of the educational and employment outcomes of 84,000 student in Florida who were in the 12th grade in 2000. Specifically, the study looked at students who enrolled in college transfer and technical education programs offered at two-year colleges.

Concludes the study:

Community colleges already make major contributions to economic mobility by
enabling students to transfer to four-year colleges, and by teaching work-enhancing
skills. The primary beneficiaries of the transfer function are low-income students who
perform well in high school and college. The primary beneficiaries of the career-enhancing
function are low-income students who did not perform especially well in high school,
but take a wide range of high-return courses while attending community college,
especially courses in health care.
The largest factor limiting the ability of community colleges to raise the earnings of
their students through the transfer function is students’ poor academic preparation in
high school and the difficulty of quickly boosting their performance through developmental
programs. The Florida cohort analysis clearly demonstrates that students need to have
a B or better high school grade point average to have a reasonable chance of attaining
AA degrees, transferring to four-year colleges, and attaining BA degrees. But lack of
supportive services also appears to be of considerable importance, especially in explaining
why more high-performing low-income students do not transfer to four-year colleges.
The Florida study also shows that among A and B+ students, those from low-income
families are 5 percentage points less likely to attend college and 1 percentage point
less likely to attain AA degrees, but over 11 percentage points less likely to transfer
to four-year colleges and attain BA degrees.

Community colleges already make major contributions to economic mobility by enabling students to transfer to four-year colleges, and by teaching work-enhancing skills. The primary beneficiaries of the transfer function are low-income students who perform well in high school and college. The primary beneficiaries of the career-enhancing function are low-income students who did not perform especially well in high school, but take a wide range of high-return courses while attending community college,especially courses in health care.

The largest factor limiting the ability of community colleges to raise the earnings of their students through the transfer function is students’ poor academic preparation in high school and the difficulty of quickly boosting their performance through developmental programs. The Florida cohort analysis clearly demonstrates that students need to have a B or better high school grade point average to have a reasonable chance of attaining AA degrees, transferring to four-year colleges, and attaining BA degrees. But lack of supportive services also appears to be of considerable importance, especially in explaining why more high-performing low-income students do not transfer to four-year colleges. The Florida study also shows that among A and B+ students, those from low-income families are 5 percentage points less likely to attend college and 1 percentage point less likely to attain AA degrees, but over 11 percentage points less likely to transfer to four-year colleges and attain BA degrees.

12.11.2009 Policy Points Comments Off on Public Understanding of the Economy

Public Understanding of the Economy

The ongoing recession has demonstrated the importance of public policy to the structure and operation of the American economy. Yet most Americans don’t fully understand the pivotal role that intentional policy choices in shaping economic outcomes and driving prosperity.

Over the past three years, the public policy organizations Demos and Topos have engaged in an intensive study of the American public’s understanding of  the economy and the role that government action plays in the daily functioning of the economy. In a recent research brief, the organizations laid out some key findings:

The story that Americans currently tell themselves about the economy reflects a uniquely American perspective,
and creates tremendous challenges for advocates seeking to change economic policy. This story sends the message
that economic conditions are subject to natural fluctuations much like the weather. The only influence we have on
the economy is as private, success-driven individuals who either work hard and get ahead, or don’t and fall behind.
In this story, government action is a last resort and is used only to protect the deserving and to police bad actors,
and even then it risks creating dependency and stifling business productivity.
While the research undertaken by Topos on behalf of Dēmos has uncovered deep-seated public perspectives about
the economy that hinder productive engagement in economic policy, it has also identified the core elements needed
to reshape public discourse and understanding. Those who would support a more active role for government in
a whole range of economic policies will need to carefully avoid the traps that trigger unproductive thinking while
consciously and deliberately evoking a new perspective.
Americans need to hear – and feel comfortable telling – a story that offers alternative images and understandings
that will allow them to feel competent and confident in asserting a new role for themselves as citizens and stewards
of a shared prosperity. This story must also help them see the possibility of a constructive government role that implements
policies that shape economic conditions and foster a shared prosperity.

The story that Americans currently tell themselves about the economy reflects a uniquely American perspective, and creates tremendous challenges for advocates seeking to change economic policy. This story sends the message that economic conditions are subject to natural fluctuations much like the weather. The only influence we have on the economy is as private, success-driven individuals who either work hard and get ahead, or don’t and fall behind. In this story, government action is a last resort and is used only to protect the deserving and to police bad actors, and even then it risks creating dependency and stifling business productivity.

While the research undertaken by Topos on behalf of Dēmos has uncovered deep-seated public perspectives about the economy that hinder productive engagement in economic policy, it has also identified the core elements needed to reshape public discourse and understanding. Those who would support a more active role for government in a whole range of economic policies will need to carefully avoid the traps that trigger unproductive thinking while consciously and deliberately evoking a new perspective.

11.11.2009 Policy Points Comments Off on Helping Low-Income Adults Succeed

Helping Low-Income Adults Succeed

Recent years have seen a burst in public, private, nonprofit, and philanthropic efforts designed to help low-income young adults acquire postsecondary credentials and career-relevant skills.  For instance, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is seeking to double the number of low-income students who earn a meaningful postsecondary credential by age 26.

Unfortunately, the sheer volume of programmatic and policy activities has led to to confusion over what works and how effective programs could be structured. To bring clarity to the discussion, The Workforce Strategy Center, a New York-based research firm, recently published a typology of innovative efforts.

The center scanned existing practices and identified those that met four criteria: 1) help low-income students earn meaningful postsecondary credentials; 2) partner with employers in industries relevant to regional economies; 3) cultivate employer involvement and commitment; and 4) demonstrate portability, scalability, and replicability.

Using those criteria, the center then identified 14 major models that can be classified by organizational type, target populations, target industries, location, governance, funding, scale, and outcomes. In general, concludes the study, successful efforts share certain common features, including the following:
read more

11.11.2009 Policy Points Comments Off on Editor’s Note

Editor’s Note

Between November 5 and November 17, Policy Points will be updated on a reduced schedule. During that time, the blog will be updated once per weekday at approximately 8 AM. Posting will return to a three-per-weekday schedule on November 18.

Also, remember that Policy Points is available as an RSS feed. Click here to subscribe using any number of popular RSS readers.

10.11.2009 Policy Points Comments Off on North Carolina’s Green Economy

North Carolina’s Green Economy

A recent study commissioned by the National Governors Association analyzed the size and scope of the “green economy” in each of the 50 states. For the purposes of the study, the green economy was defined as businesses that produce products or services that provide alternatives to carbon-based energy, conserve the use of resources, or reduce pollution and waste.

As the graph (below) illustrates, North Carolina’s economy enjoys competitive advantages in the areas of energy infrastructure, sustainable agriculture,, energy efficiency, alternative transportation, and water management.  In all of these green fields, North Carolina has experienced an increasing concentration of employment opportunities since 1995.

clean energy